Few religious observances have accumulated as many layers of history as Christmas. For Christians, the feast commemorates the birth of Jesus Christ and the mystery of the Incarnation, the belief that God entered human history in the person of Jesus. Yet the familiar Christmas of December 25, Nativity scenes, carols, decorated trees, gift-giving, family gatherings, and seasonal celebrations did not appear all at once.
The history of Christmas developed over centuries. Its foundation lies in the New Testament accounts of the birth of Jesus, but neither Gospel that describes the Nativity gives a calendar date. Early Christians disagreed about when Jesus had been born, and evidence for an established annual celebration of the Nativity appears only gradually. By the fourth century, December 25 had become associated with Christ’s birth at Rome, while January 6 had developed as an important feast of Christ’s manifestation in parts of the Christian East. From those beginnings, Christmas expanded through medieval Christianity, survived fierce Reformation debates, was outlawed in some Protestant societies, and eventually became one of the most widely observed religious and cultural holidays in the world.
The Nativity According to Matthew and Luke
The earliest sources for the Christian meaning of Christmas are the Gospels of Matthew and Luke. Although the two accounts overlap in important ways, each tells the story from a different perspective.
Matthew begins with a genealogy connecting Jesus to Abraham and David before turning to Mary, Joseph, and the miraculous conception of Jesus. Joseph occupies an especially important place in Matthew’s account. After learning that Mary is pregnant, he considers ending their betrothal quietly, but an angel appears to him in a dream and tells him that the child has been conceived through the Holy Spirit. Joseph is instructed to name the child Jesus.
Matthew then places Jesus’ birth at Bethlehem during the reign of Herod the Great. Magi arrive from the East after seeing a star associated with the birth of the king of the Jews. The Gospel does not call them kings and does not say there were three of them. The later number of three became associated with the three gifts that Matthew names: gold, frankincense, and myrrh. After the Magi visit Jesus and Mary, Joseph is warned in another dream that Herod intends to kill the child. The family flees into Egypt and later returns after Herod’s death, eventually settling in Nazareth.
Luke provides much of the imagery that later became central to the traditional Christmas scene. His account includes the annunciation to Mary, the pregnancy of Elizabeth, the birth of John the Baptist, and the journey of Joseph and Mary to Bethlehem. Jesus is born there and placed in a manger. Shepherds watching their flocks receive the angelic announcement of the birth and go to see the child. Luke then follows the story through Jesus’ circumcision and presentation at the Temple, where Simeon and Anna recognize the significance of the child.
The familiar Nativity scene therefore combines elements from both Gospels. The shepherds come from Luke, while the Magi come from Matthew. Neither Gospel describes the complete Christmas scene exactly as it is often represented in later art, pageants, and Nativity displays.
More importantly for the history of Christmas, neither Matthew nor Luke identifies December 25 as the date of Jesus’ birth.
Early Christians and the Question of Jesus’ Birthday
For the first generations of Christians, the death and resurrection of Jesus occupied a much more clearly defined place in the developing Christian calendar than his birthday. Easter developed around the commemoration of Christ’s Passion and Resurrection, while evidence for an annual Nativity feast emerges considerably later.
Christians nevertheless became interested in calculating the chronology of Jesus’ life.
Around the beginning of the third century, Clement of Alexandria recorded several attempts to determine the date of Jesus’ birth. He reported that some calculated the birth on the twenty-fifth day of the Egyptian month Pachon, while others proposed the twenty-fourth or twenty-fifth of Pharmuthi. His account is especially important because it demonstrates that Christians were calculating a birthday for Jesus, but there was no single universally accepted date around the year 200. Clement does not identify December 25 as the uncontested birthday of Christ.
Other Christian chronographers produced still more calculations. The anonymous author of the third-century De Pascha Computus, for example, placed Christ’s birth in March. Such disagreements should not be surprising. The Gospels provided theological and historical frameworks for the Nativity, but they did not provide later Christians with an explicit day and month.
One particularly important and debated source is Hippolytus of Rome. A surviving textual tradition of his Commentary on Daniel has been interpreted as placing Jesus’ birth on December 25. Because the textual history of the passage has been disputed, historians have treated it cautiously. More recent work by Thomas C. Schmidt has argued that other chronological writings associated with Hippolytus also support the conclusion that he calculated December 25 as the birthday of Jesus by the early third century. Schmidt’s research suggests that Christian calculations leading to December 25 may have existed well before the first indisputable evidence for an annual Roman Christmas feast.
This evidence has become particularly important because it complicates one of the most familiar explanations for the origins of Christmas.
Why December 25?
The choice of December 25 has produced one of the longest historical debates surrounding Christmas.
One explanation, often called the history of religions theory, emphasizes the religious environment of the Roman Empire. Roman society already contained festivals during the winter season, including Saturnalia, and late Roman religion also included devotion to the sun. A celebration associated with the unconquered or invincible one appears on December 25 in a fourth-century Roman calendar and has traditionally been interpreted as a festival of Sol Invictus, the Unconquered Sun.
According to this interpretation, Christians deliberately placed Christ’s birth on or near an existing pagan solar celebration, either to compete with the festival or to reinterpret the symbolism of the returning sun around the winter solstice.
There is another explanation, however. Usually called the calculation or computation theory, it argues that December 25 developed primarily from Christian chronological speculation. Some ancient Christians connected major events in sacred history with the same calendar dates. Calculations connecting Christ’s conception with the date assigned to his Passion, particularly March 25 in some Western traditions, could produce a birth nine months later on December 25.
Modern scholarship has increasingly treated the question with caution rather than assuming a simple answer. C. P. E. Nothaft has argued that the traditional opposition between a pagan replacement theory and a purely Christian calculation theory is too simple. Christian chronology, Roman religion, solar symbolism, and the religious environment of late antiquity could all have influenced the development and interpretation of the feast. Paul Bradshaw likewise treats the two explanations as competing theories whose evidence must be weighed rather than reducing Christmas to a single act of borrowing.
The Chronography of 354 and the Roman Christmas
The clearest early evidence for December 25 comes from the remarkable collection known as the Chronography of 354, a Roman compilation prepared in the fourth century.
One section contains a calendar of Christian commemorations. At the entry for the eighth day before the Kalends of January, meaning December 25, appears the statement natus Christus in Betleem Iudeae, identifying Christ as born in Bethlehem of Judea. The material behind this portion of the compilation is commonly associated with the Roman Christian calendar of the 330s, making it crucial evidence that the Nativity was being commemorated on December 25 at Rome by the middle of the fourth century.
The same compilation makes the debate even more interesting. Its Roman civil calendar places Saturnalia on December 17. On December 25 it records N INVICTI with thirty races, an observance usually understood as the birthday of the Unconquered. Thus a single fourth-century collection preserves evidence of both a Christian Nativity date and a Roman observance connected with the unconquered one on December 25.
That evidence establishes coexistence. It does not, by itself, establish causation.
The popular statement that Christmas was simply Saturnalia moved to December 25 is especially misleading. The surviving Roman calendar distinguishes Saturnalia on December 17 from the December 25 observance of the Invictus festival. Saturnalian customs such as feasting, social relaxation, and gift exchange are relevant when studying the broader festive culture of the Roman winter, but they do not provide a simple documentary chain showing that the Christian Nativity feast was merely Saturnalia under another name.
Likewise, the presence of a solar celebration on December 25 makes comparison with Sol Invictus historically necessary, but scholars continue to debate which observance came first on that particular date, whether Christians were deliberately responding to solar religion, and how much Christian chronological calculations contributed to the choice. The evidence supports a complex late Roman environment rather than a simple story of Christians copying a pagan holiday.
Christmas and Epiphany in the Christian East
December 25 did not immediately become the universal Christian date for celebrating the Nativity.
January 6 held great importance in parts of Eastern Christianity. The feast known as Epiphany or Theophany could commemorate the manifestation of Christ, his birth, his baptism, or combinations of events associated with his appearance in the world. Bradshaw argues that an Egyptian January 6 observance played an important role in the early history of the Nativity feast before December 25 spread more widely from the West.
By the late fourth century, however, surviving sermons allow historians to watch Christmas taking root in major Eastern Christian centers.
Gregory of Nazianzus delivered his famous Oration 38 on the Theophany or Birthday of Christ around 380. The sermon presents the birth of Christ as a profound theological celebration of the Incarnation. Gregory repeatedly returns to the astonishing Christian claim that the eternal Christ had entered human existence. His sermon demonstrates that the Nativity had become a major occasion for Christian preaching and theological reflection.
John Chrysostom provides even more direct evidence. Preaching at Antioch in the 380s, he discussed the date of the Nativity and acknowledged that the observance had become established there only recently. His sermon refers to information concerning the feast coming from the West, allowing historians to see the December celebration spreading geographically rather than appearing everywhere at once.
Other fourth-century evidence tells the same story. Ephrem the Syrian composed Nativity hymns filled with theological imagery, while the Apostolic Constitutions recognized a festival commemorating Christ’s birth. By the fifth century, preachers such as Augustine of Hippo and Leo the Great delivered elaborate Nativity sermons, demonstrating that Christmas had become firmly established within the worship and theology of major Christian communities.
From the Incarnation to a Medieval Festival
During the Middle Ages, Christmas became one of the great feasts of Western Christianity.
The religious center of the celebration remained the Incarnation. Churches marked the Nativity through Masses, prayers, preaching, hymns, and increasingly elaborate representations of the birth of Christ. Devotion to the infant Jesus and the Virgin Mary became especially important, and visual representations of the manger helped make the biblical narrative accessible to communities far beyond the clergy and monasteries.
Yet medieval Christmas was never confined to formal worship.
Kati Ihnat’s study of medieval Christmas describes a feast that joined religious devotion with merriment, drama, games, feasting, and social customs. Liturgical dramas brought biblical events into churches, while traditions such as the Boy Bishop and Feast of Fools temporarily inverted normal social and ecclesiastical hierarchies. Medieval Christmas could therefore be solemn and exuberant at the same time.
The interaction between Christianity and older winter customs also varied from region to region.
The eighth-century scholar Bede provides particularly important evidence from Anglo-Saxon England. Writing about the calendar of the pre-Christian English, he stated that the months corresponding roughly with December and January were associated with Giuli. He also said that the night corresponding to the Christian Nativity had once been called Modranecht, or Mothers’ Night, because of ceremonies held during the night.
Bede’s testimony shows that Christian Christmas entered societies that already possessed midwinter calendars and observances. It does not mean that Christmas itself can be reduced to an earlier English or Germanic festival. Instead, Christian communities repeatedly encountered local customs, reinterpreted some, rejected others, and allowed still others to exist beside the religious feast.
This pattern would continue throughout Christmas history.
Christmas and the Reformation
The Protestant Reformation transformed Christianity in Europe, and Christmas became part of the argument over what Christian worship should look like.
Not every Protestant tradition rejected the feast. The Church of England’s 1549 Book of Common Prayer, produced during the English Reformation, retained Christmas as an important liturgical day. Christmas worship remained centered upon Scripture, prayer, Communion, and the birth of Christ. The survival of the feast within the prayer book demonstrates that Protestant reform did not automatically mean opposition to Christmas.
Other reformers were far more hostile.
Some radical Protestants, particularly those influenced by Reformed and Puritan ideas, argued that Christians should not observe festivals that had not been explicitly commanded in Scripture. Christmas also carried centuries of customs involving drinking, feasting, games, social inversion, and other practices that stricter reformers regarded as disorderly or superstitious.
The result was one of the most dramatic episodes in Christmas history.
During the political and religious upheavals of seventeenth-century England, Parliament moved against traditional feast days. In 1647, legislation abolished the customary observance of Christmas, Easter, and other festivals. This did not erase Christmas from English society, and resistance to the restrictions demonstrated how deeply the holiday had already entered popular culture. Modern scholarship emphasizes that attempts to suppress Christmas were difficult to enforce and ultimately temporary.
Across the Atlantic, Puritan New England produced an even clearer surviving legal record.
In 1659, the Massachusetts Bay Colony imposed a five-shilling fine upon people found observing Christmas through feasting, refraining from labor, or similar activities. The law condemned such observances as remnants of festivals considered superstitious. The document is important because it shows that opposition to Christmas was not simply an absence of celebration. In some places it became a matter of law.
Christmas survived.
The Nineteenth-Century Transformation
Christmas entered the nineteenth century as an old religious feast with centuries of traditions behind it. The Victorians did not invent Christmas, but the nineteenth century profoundly changed how millions of people experienced it.
The celebration increasingly moved toward the home and family. Children assumed a larger place in Christmas culture. Trees, cards, presents, charitable giving, seasonal literature, and images of domestic happiness became increasingly visible. Traditions that had older European histories were spread through printing, migration, commerce, urbanization, and mass culture.
Timothy Larsen describes this period as a major transformation in which Christmas became increasingly domestic. Protestant groups that had once rejected the holiday gradually embraced it, while Christmas trees spread from German traditions into other countries. Britain popularized the Christmas card, and charity grew alongside an expanding commercial Christmas economy.
In the United States, the developing figure of Santa Claus was shaped by a mixture of Saint Nicholas traditions, Dutch and British influences, poetry, illustration, and popular culture.
One of the most influential documents appeared in 1823 when the Troy Sentinel published the poem commonly known as “A Visit from St. Nicholas.” The poem helped popularize the image of a nighttime Christmas visitor arriving in a sleigh pulled by reindeer and entering through the chimney. The Library of Congress records its first publication on December 23, 1823.
Twenty years later, Charles Dickens published A Christmas Carol.
Dickens did not create Christmas, nor did he single-handedly restore a forgotten holiday. What he did was give extraordinary literary force to themes already becoming central to nineteenth-century Christmas culture: family, memory, generosity, feasting, childhood, charity, social responsibility, and the possibility of moral renewal. Published in December 1843, the story of Ebenezer Scrooge became one of the most enduring works ever associated with the season.
By the end of the century, the Christmas familiar to much of the modern English-speaking world had taken recognizable shape.
A Holiday with Many Histories
Modern Christmas is simultaneously ancient, medieval, early modern, Victorian, religious, familial, commercial, and local.
The manger leads back to Luke. The Magi come from Matthew. The theological meaning of the feast was shaped by early Christian reflection on the Incarnation. December 25 emerges from the complicated world of ancient Christian chronological calculations and late Roman religious culture. Medieval Christians expanded the feast through worship, music, drama, and communal celebration. Reformation Christians fought over whether it should be celebrated at all. Nineteenth-century families helped transform it into an increasingly domestic holiday centered on children, presents, charity, and the home.
Some customs have pre-Christian parallels. Others developed within Christian worship. Still others emerged through medieval devotion, early modern culture, or modern commerce. Attempts to identify a single moment when “Christmas was invented” therefore miss the nature of the holiday itself.
Christmas was built layer by layer.
Was Christmas Originally Pagan?
Few claims about Christmas are repeated as confidently as the statement that the holiday is simply a Christian version of a pagan winter festival.
The surviving evidence does not support such a simple conclusion.
Roman winter religion certainly forms part of the historical context. Saturnalia involved December festivities, and the fourth-century Roman calendar records the birthday of the Unconquered on December 25. Germanic and Anglo-Saxon societies also possessed midwinter traditions long before Christianity became dominant in northern Europe.
Christians living in these societies could hardly have remained untouched by the cultures around them.
Yet there is also evidence that Christian scholars were independently calculating dates for the conception and birth of Jesus. Clement of Alexandria shows chronological interest around the year 200. The disputed Hippolytan material may take December 25 back into the early third century. The Chronography of 354 provides firm evidence for December 25 in Roman Christianity, and later preachers explain and defend the feast in explicitly Christian theological terms.
Modern historians therefore have good reason to reject both extremes. Christmas did not develop in a cultural vacuum, but neither can its origin be explained by saying that Christians merely renamed Saturnalia. Steven Hijmans, C. P. E. Nothaft, Thomas Talley, Susan Roll, Paul Bradshaw, and Thomas C. Schmidt have all contributed to a scholarly discussion in which chronology, theology, Roman religion, solar imagery, and cultural interaction must be considered together.
Why the History of Christmas Matters
The history of Christmas offers a remarkable example of how religious traditions grow.
At its center stands a Christian claim about an event in first-century Judea: the birth of Jesus. Around that center accumulated questions the New Testament did not answer, including the exact date of the birth. Christians calculated, debated, preached, sang, dramatized, legislated, celebrated, rejected, restored, and reshaped the feast across nearly two thousand years.
Christmas survived the collapse of the Western Roman Empire. It entered Germanic kingdoms and medieval towns. It passed through the Reformation and was outlawed by governments that believed its observance unbiblical. It crossed the Atlantic, changed again in North America, entered mass print culture, became connected with Santa Claus and the Christmas tree, and eventually developed into a global celebration observed in ways that its earliest Christian celebrants could scarcely have imagined.
What remained remarkably durable was the event around which the feast had first been constructed.
The annual celebration still returned to Bethlehem.
From the shepherds of Luke and the Magi of Matthew to the Roman calendars of late antiquity, the sermons of Gregory and Chrysostom, the medieval Mass, the Puritan controversy, and the Victorian family gathering, Christmas accumulated centuries of human history without losing the Nativity from which the Christian feast took its meaning.
Sources & Further Reading
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. “Matthew, Chapter 1.” New American Bible. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://bible.usccb.org/bible/matthew/1
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. “Matthew, Chapter 2.” New American Bible. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://bible.usccb.org/bible/matthew/2
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. “Luke, Chapter 1.” New American Bible. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://bible.usccb.org/bible/luke/1
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. “Luke, Chapter 2.” New American Bible. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://bible.usccb.org/bible/luke/2
Justin Martyr. Dialogue with Trypho. In Ante-Nicene Fathers. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/01286.htm
Protoevangelium of James. In Ante-Nicene Fathers. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0847.htm
Clement of Alexandria. The Stromata. Book 1, chap. 21. In Ante-Nicene Fathers. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/02101.htm
Origen. Against Celsus. Book 1, chap. 51. In Ante-Nicene Fathers. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://ccel.org/ccel/origen/against_celsus/anf04.vi.ix.i.lii.html
Pseudo-Cyprian. De Pascha Computus. 243. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://updatedworks.com/patrologia-latina/texts/de-pascha-computus/
Hippolytus of Rome. Commentary on Daniel. Book 4. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://dec25th.info/Textual%20Tradition%20of%20Hippolytus%20Commentary%20on%20Daniel.html
Anonymous. Chronography of 354. Part 6, Roman Calendar. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://catholiclibrary.org/library/view?chunk.id=00000006&docId=%2FFathers-EN%2FAnonymous.Chronographyof354.en.html
Anonymous. Chronography of 354. Part 12, Depositio Martyrum. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://catholiclibrary.org/library/view?chunk.id=00000012&docId=%2FFathers-EN%2FAnonymous.Chronographyof354.en.html
Julian. Hymn to King Helios. 362. Perseus Digital Library. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://catalog.perseus.tufts.edu/catalog/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg2003.tlg011.perseus-grc1
Apostolic Constitutions. Book 5. In Ante-Nicene Fathers. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/07155.htm
Gregory of Nazianzus. “Oration 38: On the Theophany, or Birthday of Christ.” In Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/310238.htm
John Chrysostom. “Homily on the Date of Christmas.” Early Church Texts. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://earlychurchtexts.com/public/john_chrysostom_homily_in_diem_natalem_domini_nostri_jesu_christi.htm
Ephrem the Syrian. Hymns on the Nativity. In Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf213/npnf213.iii.v.ii.html
Augustine of Hippo. “Sermon 190: On the Nativity of the Lord.” Accessed October 12, 2026. https://www.wrf.global/blog/blog-2/christian-life/a-christmas-homily-from-the-early-church-sermon-on-the-nativity-of-the-lord-190-by-augustine-of-hippo
Leo the Great. “Sermon 21: On the Feast of the Nativity I.” In Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/360321.htm
Leo the Great. “Sermon 26: On the Feast of the Nativity VI.” In Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/360326.htm
Seneca. “Letter 18: On Festivals and Fasting.” In Moral Letters to Lucilius. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://seneca.ink/letters/18-on-festivals-and-fasting
Martial. Epigrams. Book 5. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://www.tertullian.org/fathers/martial_epigrams_book05.htm
Macrobius. Saturnalia. Translated by Percival Vaughan Davies. LacusCurtius. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://penelope.uchicago.edu/thayer/e/roman/texts/macrobius/saturnalia/home.html
Bede. De Temporum Ratione. Chap. 15. 725. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://la.wikisource.org/wiki/De_ratione_temporum
Church of England. The Book of Common Prayer. 1549. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://justus.anglican.org/resources/bcp/1549/BCP_1549.htm
English Parliament. “An Ordinance for Abolishing of Festivals.” June 8, 1647. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://reformedbooksonline.com/the-1647-english-parliament-on-christmas/
Massachusetts Bay Colony. “Penalty for Keeping Christmas, 1659.” In Records of the Governor and Company of the Massachusetts Bay in New England. Edited by Nathaniel B. Shurtleff. Vol. 4, pt. 1. Boston, 1854. https://www.mass.gov/files/documents/2016/08/qj/christmas1659.pdf
“A Visit from St. Nicholas.” Troy Sentinel, December 23, 1823. Library of Congress. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://www.loc.gov/item/today-in-history/december-24/
Dickens, Charles. A Christmas Carol. London: Chapman and Hall, 1843. Project Gutenberg. https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/46
Bradshaw, Paul F. “The Dating of Christmas: The Early Church.” In The Oxford Handbook of Christmas, edited by Timothy Larsen, 3–14. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/34256/chapter-abstract/290408494
Larsen, Timothy, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Christmas. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/34256
Roll, Susan K. Toward the Origins of Christmas. Kampen: Kok Pharos, 1995. https://books.google.com/books/about/Toward_the_Origins_of_Christmas.html?id=6MXPEMbpjoAC
Talley, Thomas J. The Origins of the Liturgical Year. 2nd ed. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 1991. https://books.google.com/books/about/The_origins_of_the_liturgical_year.html?id=mXe30QEACAAJ
Nothaft, C. P. E. “The Origins of the Christmas Date: Some Recent Trends in Historical Research.” Church History 81, no. 4 (2012): 903–11. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/church-history/article/abs/origins-of-the-christmas-date-some-recent-trends-in-historical-research/3767138672A4C2DFBED6BD1B004FB78A
Schmidt, Thomas C. “Calculating December 25 as the Birth of Jesus in Hippolytus’ Canon and Chronicon.” Vigiliae Christianae 69, no. 5 (2015): 542–63. https://brill.com/view/journals/vc/69/5/article-p542_6.xml
Hijmans, Steven E. “Sol Invictus, the Winter Solstice, and the Origins of Christmas.” Mouseion 3, no. 3 (2003): 377–98. https://www.historyoftheancientworld.com/2011/12/sol-invictus-the-winter-solstice-and-origins-of-christmas/
Salzman, Michele Renee. On Roman Time: The Codex-Calendar of 354 and the Rhythms of Urban Life in Late Antiquity. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990. https://publishing.cdlib.org/ucpressebooks/view?docId=ft2w1004g7&brand=ucpress
Kelly, Joseph F. The Origins of Christmas. Rev. ed. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 2014. https://litpress.org/Products/4860/The-Origins-of-Christmas
Hutton, Ronald. The Stations of the Sun: A History of the Ritual Year in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996. https://academic.oup.com/book/1390
Ihnat, Kati. “The Middle Ages.” In The Oxford Handbook of Christmas, edited by Timothy Larsen. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/34256/chapter-abstract/290408617
Wheeler, Katrina Jennie-Lou. “The Reformation and Early Modern Periods.” In The Oxford Handbook of Christmas, edited by Timothy Larsen. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/34256/chapter-abstract/290408799
Larsen, Timothy. “The Nineteenth Century.” In The Oxford Handbook of Christmas, edited by Timothy Larsen. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/34256/chapter-abstract/290408935
Holmes, Andrew R. “Reformed and Dissenting Protestants.” In The Oxford Handbook of Christmas, edited by Timothy Larsen. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/34256/chapter-abstract/290411641
Restad, Penne L. Christmas in America: A History. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995. https://academic.oup.com/book/7590
Forbes, Bruce David. Christmas: A Candid History. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007. https://www.ucpress.edu/books/christmas/paper
Library of Congress. “Today in History: December 25.” Accessed October 12, 2026. https://www.loc.gov/item/today-in-history/december-25/